“Everybody Loves Hugo”

One of the show’s most beloved characters finds out he has the power (he has he touch!) to control his own future and be an important part of what happens on the island. Plus, a certain love interest returns.

Scott

As perhaps the only person in the world who wasn’t bonkers about “Happily Ever After”, I am thrilled that this week’s “Everybody Loves Hugo” renewed my faith in the final stretch of a show that I’ve devoted entirely too much time and mental energy to. If “Happily” provided a (labored, hokey, frankly lazy) bridge between season 6′s two worlds, “Hugo” went hog wild with it, finding our titular hero getting in tune with his other side by kissing the girl of his dreams as Desmond plays omniscient Jiminy Cricket watching the star-cross’d lovers with a smirk and expensive shades. Then Des gets all gangsta on alt-Locke, running homeboy down in a high school parking lot! DAYUM!

On that note, while the A-story focused on the beloved Hugo, I couldn’t stop thinking about Locke tonight, and I DO mean Locke. We’ve grown used to seeing Terry O’Quinn as Smokey purposefully moving forward with a sinister glint in his eye. But when we first see him this week, he’s calmly whittling, “waiting”, and generally acting a whole lot like… John Locke. Then he comes across Desmond and asks if he knows who he is. “John Locke,” he replies, seemingly knowing the full weight of such a pronouncement. Smokey is not amused.

So why does Des pull a hit on a poor dude in a wheelchair who’s finally found the woman of his dreams and a nice job as a substitute gym teacher? My guess is he’s trying to force Locke’s consciousness back into his body, either exorcising Smokey or maybe obliterating him altogether. He’s acting very Dr. Manhattan since the closing moments of last week’s episode, unafraid of Widmore and Smokey’s threats because he knows how this song ends; he’s just got to hit the right notes.

Three final thoughts. While it was nice to see Hurley and Libby get the date they never had, this episode seems like a strange waste of Cynthia Watros’ time. I think I speak for all of human civilization when I say that I’d rather have seen how a woman goes from being in a mental hospital to being an eccentric billionaire who funds Desmond’s sailing expedition around the world. And is anybody happy with this explanation of what the whispers are? I once theorized that Smokey was a whirling vortex of all the lost souls on the island, and while I was wrong about the specifics, I was on the right track. But why can everyone hear them but not see them? And why were they used to announce the presence of the Others? It’s a bit of a half-assed explanation. Finally, Ilana’s death (can’t believe I’m discussing the season’s first big death as an afterthought) was unworthy of a great and still-mysterious character who gave this season its best scene so far: Ben’s redemption through a simple act of faith and forgiveness.

Chris

Episodes like this seriously make me wonder why the hell we were spending so much time futzing around at The Temple earlier in the season. THIS is the good stuff. THIS is what I was waiting for. All that temple stuff feels like deleted scenes – a worthless distraction. Kinda like Richard’s crusade to get rid of the plane. I don’t see the point of that story thread except as momentary distraction. But I’m really happy that they’re finally kicking the alt-timeline-merging into high gear and that’s more like the LOST I loved in Seasons 3 and 4.

Last week’s and this week’s episode feel like we’re getting to the final curtain call with all these cameos and alt-timeline hijinks. You’ve got Charlie’s bit from the previous (awesome) episode and then Michael and Libby in this one. Great to see them back, especially Libby. It’s fluffy fan service where the only real point is to move the on-island characters where they need to be but I’m loving it. Not to mention that they’re starting to pseudo-explain that Hurley’s seeing dead people that are “trapped” on the island – an interesting revelation that in my mind seems to clash with him seeing Charlie or playing chess with Mr. Eko in Season 5. Though maybe there’s a theory to that since he hasn’t seen dead-Charlie or dead-Eko on the island. Hm.

Back to Hurley/Libby. I thought their interactions in this episode were great. It was fun seeing Alt-Timeline Lucky Hugo still have the character traits that makes him such a likable character. His sheepishness around women (both his mother and in general), his giving nature, his insecurity. Their beach date (aww, just like they were supposed to have in Season 2! Fan service!) was a touching moment and a nice little wrap-up to the Libby/Hugo story. Maybe it’s not completely over for them but I feel like we’ve got a little closure with their beach-date and ghost-Michael’s apology.

Yet through all this lovey-dovey touchy-feely fun stuff there was Locke and Desmond. Was Desmond running over Locke in the Alt-World payback for pushing him down the well on the island? How cold were both of those things? Pretty amazing. I gotta say I was not expecting Alt-Des to hit and run like that. Completely awesome ending to the episode. How much does Alt-Des know about what’s happening on-island? I guess he knows that he gets pushed down a well but he only vaguely knew Hurley “from somewhere.”

One last thing. The way they got rid of Ilana felt cheap. Rushed. And like The Temple stuff suddenly I’m wondering why they had to have that story branch with her at all. I still don’t know how they’re going to wrap this whole thing up with just a few scant episodes left. It seems like there are a lot of chess pieces to get moving before things can end. But – finally, LOST is getting super-awesome again.

Armando

For me, this episode was pretty much an extension of last week’s Desmond-centric (and in my opinion, great) episode. While I am not as crazy about it as last week’s, I still thought it was very good. The two timelines are inching ever closer together and I am no longer thinking the alt-time line is the new “true” time line. (Whatever that means) Slowly all the Losties paths are crossing in the alt-verse and it looks like them coming together well may be the clashing of the time lines and what ingnites the climax of the series.

One of the saddest moments of the series for me was Libby’s death, and it was good to see Hurley and Libby together again. And speaking of death, I’m starting to wonder if dying on the island is really dying. I’m sensing a Buddhist type undertone (along with quite a few Buddhist symbols, i.e. the  frozen wheel that was used to “move” the island looking like a Dharmacakra) in regards to the making of right choices and the subsequent results of Karma. I’m not sure how, but maybe dying on the island is somehow connected to reincarnation?

The whispers explanation? Meh. I guess. Hopefully this is fleshed out a bit more in the SIX HOURS OF LOST THAT ARE LEFT!!!  *tear*

It was interesting to see Smocke drop Desmond and then see Desmond drop—OK, run the hell over—Locke. A little bit of the timelines connecting? Will it “knock” Locke (see what I did there?) back into his island body? Did Desmond hit Locke to get him to Jack to further along the beginning of the end of the alt-verse and LOST as we know it? Can this story be wrapped up (as much as it can at this point) in just six more hours? Hmmmm.

Dennis

Hey look, someone found a copy of Alice in Wonderland. And then Desmond fell down a well. Oh, LOST. Sometimes you have the subtlety of a Twilight movie. After wanting to marry last week’s episode (though I’m not sure if Human/TV episode has been legalized yet anywhere), I was bound to not love this episode as much.

Still, Hurley is really one of those characters I’ve grown to love over the course of the seasons, so it was nice to see another, and presumably the last Hugo showcase here. I’ve always enjoyed Cynthia Watros (from her days on the Fox sitcom Titus) and was bummed when LOST went and killed her off (and at the same time as the dreaded Ana Lucia?! Not cool!).

I was happy Sideways Libby and Sideways Hurley could come together and that their magical kiss could awaken Island Hurley memories in Sideways Hurley! Wow, this soulmate crap is starting to sound more and more like a Disney movie on crack. Well, I guess ABC is owned by the Mouse House, and if the glass slipper fits…

Robert

Of all the double-take moments I had watching “Everybody Loves Hugo” maybe the biggest and most inspired wasn’t even in the episode itself. I’m talking about the disturbing and yet so fitting promo for next week’s episode “The Last Recruit” which included voiceover taken from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. I’m sure the others here will recap many of the same points of the episode just fine (although I bet nobody mentioned how boring Sayid is now), so indulge me for a few minutes while I digress.

In that film, Gene Wilder’s charming-but-devilish Willy Wonka invites his guests for a ride in his boat (check out a video clip). “‘Round the world and home again! That’s the sailor’s way!” Wonka says as they enter a mysterious tunnel. As the boat picks up speed and trippy images flash on the walls of the tunnel, the passengers—Charlie, Grandpa Joe, Veruca Salt, Violet Beauregard, et al.—become alarmed. Some want to turn around; some get sick and want to get off. Mr. Salt claims that Wonka can’t possibly see where he’s going while Charlie and Grandpa Joe remark on how strange but fun the ride is. And amidst it all, Wonka breaks into a most telling song/tirade:

There’s no earthly way of knowing
Which direction we are going.
There’s no knowing where we’re rowing
Or which way the river’s flowing.

Is it raining?
Is it snowing?
Is a hurricane a-blowing?

Not a speck of light is showing
So the danger must be growing.
Are the fires of hell a-glowing?
Is the grisly reaper mowing?

Yes, the danger must be growing
For the rowers keep on rowing
And they’re certainly not showing
Any signs that they are slowing!

Someone at ABC understands how much fans are willing to go on the ride but are becoming increasingly frustrated and anxious about where things are going. I’m noticing some fellow LOST fans are either confused, annoyed and/or somehow bored with the way this final season has been going. This promo tells us not-so-subtly that we are now in the final stretch where it’s going to pick up speed and get even more hectic—and it’s going to test our resolve as fans to hang on until the very end. And if you’re already having hard time, it might be best to get off the ride now.

But this is LOST, and there’s bound to be more to it than that. During that psychedelic ride in Wonka’s boat, Charlie and Grandpa Joe also see an image of Wonka’s fierce rival, Arthur Slugworth, who offers Charlie (and other golden ticket winners) a reward if he can help steal the secret formula to the Everlasting Gobstopper (cork, anyone?) during his visit to Wonka’s factory—and in effect, put an end to Wonka’s reign as candy king. In the end, it’s revealed that Slugworth actually worked for Wonka and was sent to test Charlie and the other guests’ virtues. As a reward, Wonka gives the factory to Charlie to live happily ever after in. Could Smokey be Slugworth to Jacob’s Wonka? Or is it the other way around? Who’s Charlie in this equation? Mind blown yet?

After that boat ride, maybe avid couch potato and fellow golden ticket winner Mike Teevee summed it up best when he said “Now why don’t they show stuff like that on TV?” Looks like he got his wish.

That was a pretty satisfying episode by all accounts, and with the final season of LOST now down to half a dozen episodes, how are you liking it so far?


Chris Johnston talks about video games old and new at Player One Podcast. Armando Reyes talks comics, music and life on the road on Twitter.

Airbender Corrections

Over the weekend, a little birdie informed me that some of the speculation in my opinion piece “The Last Word on The Last Airbender” was mistaken.

I made the argument that because show creators DiMartino and Konietzko hadn’t said much in support of the film, they had been excluded from its creative process and their once-friendly relationship with M. Night Shyamalan had surely fallen by the wayside. I followed the series closely as it was airing, and assumed that the creators would be as idealistic as I was in wanting to see its spirit captured in the film adaptation.

Evidently my idealism led me to make some incorrect assumptions. According to what I have been told, the three continue to enjoy a good working relationship, and recently it has come out that M. Night will be writing the foreward to the upcoming A:TLA artbook. DiMartino and Konietzko’s relative silence apparently has more to do with their complicated relationship with Nickelodeon than any dissatisfaction with the film.

On behalf of Sodapop Journal, I apologize for my misconstruing of the situation.

It is unfortunate that the fans of the show will receive no such apology for the whitewashed cast and gutted narrative of the film, and that the creators who owe those fans their success appear to have been willingly complicit in its shoddy treatment.

Remote Uncontrolled 23

The cast of the show Brothers and Sisters

This week I had a friend call me to discuss a show we both watch. The episode they had just seen was pretty depressing and they wanted to talk about it with someone. And I know how that might seem to some people–even some of our readers might be rolling their eyes. But dang if that isn’t why I love TV. And why I love doing this piece each week.

Because no matter how “good” or “bad” or “serious” a show is, chances are you watch it because it affects you in some way. Because it makes you care. Remote Uncontrolled is a space for us to show you how and why we care. It doesn’t matter what the show is—if you like it and you’re involved in it, talk to us. We’ll listen.

Dennis

Brothers & Sisters: “Time After Time (Parts 1 and 2)”
I haven’t felt the need to write much about this show this show until now, and that says as much about this mediocre season as it does this compelling, 2-hour flashback episode. I thought Cody Longo, Anna Wood, Kasey Campbell, and Kay Panabaker did well as the flashback Walker kids, and (what else is new?) Sally Field held her own as an ever-emotional, present day Norah . It’s just nice to see the whole (thus far lame and plodding) mystery with mustache-twirling Dennis (they really had to use that name?) York finally start to make sense and (fingers crossed!) begin to end.

Damages: “All That Crap About Your Family”
I’m happy to see the writers are remembering season 1, namely the death of Ellen’s fiance and the role Frobisher played in it. It was nice to see Noah Bean back as David, even it was just a city street-wandering ghost. And perhaps the random Frobisher side storyline, will have a point after all? Arthur did manage to hint to Craig Bierko’s actor Arthur doppelganger (for some reason this storyline reminds me of Parker Posey imitating Gale Weathers in front of Gale Weathers in Scream 3) of his order to off Ellen’s betrothed. I’m starting to hope DirecTV and Damages can work out a deal for a fourth season, as this show continues to improve from its season two misdeeds (even if I was able to predict this entire episode, from Tessa being Joe’s kid, to Marilyn not telling him she was his kid before he had her killed, it was still interesting to watch it play out). Here’s hoping if there is a season 4, Tara Summers’ poor Alex Benjamin gets her revenge for being Patty’s most emotionally abused minion in all three seasons.

Ugly Betty: “The Past Presents the Future”
Hallelujah! Henry and Betty weren’t soulmates after all! Henry showed back up with his temper throwing child in tow (not much of a surprise, since she is Charlie’s kid too), and they realized they were just two different people now. It seems the show is now priming Betty and Daniel to end up together in the series finale. I’m not sure if it’ll really happen or if that’ll be good, but I’ll check the episode out nonetheless. If the writers can end the show as perfectly as they’ve done with Justin and Austin’s gay teen romance or as well as they’ve done with Betty’s trip down Former Love Interest Lane, it’ll be a beautiful end for Betty.

Parenthood: “The Big ‘O’”
I gotta say I could never get into Gilmore Girls. Now, it was one of those shows that I always respected people who watched it (see also: Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Dexter, Supernatural and Project Runway), but I just never dug it. I always wanted to like Lauren Graham. Even when she guested on Studio 60 I was psyched she was going to get some snappy Sorkin dialogue. But then it turned out she was doing a glorified cameo as herself, and well, that show sucked anyway. Finally, though she gets a good showcase here! I’ve noted it before, but I constantly find her to be the most interesting part of this show. As Jason Ritter asks her out via a note, while she’s tending bar, I was as interested in how’d she react as his character probably was. Speaking of Ritter, this show has a way with guest stars as he and Minka Kelly (reunited with Friday Night Lights writer-producer Jason Katmis here) demonstrate. Ritter and Lauren Graham are a cute May-December pairing (rejoice! Nary a “cougar” mention in sight), and Kelly helped give previously bland blonde wife Monica Potter her moment to shine as well. Glad to here ratings for this have improved, because it’s certainly growing on me…

Justified: “Long in the Tooth”
I like how this show blends comedy and crime. Alan Ruck (always Ferris Bueller’s pal Cameron to me) was a bad guy who decided to be like Hermey the Elf in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (seriously) and become a dentist. Unfortunately he decides to rip some guy’s teeth out without novocaine (the most traumatizing TV scene in a long time) and back on the run he goes. Between these interesting guest stars/characters and supporting players (Rachel got to try on the hat!) the declining ratings of this gem are just not… (here it comes!) justified.

Zoe

Bones: “The Parts in the Sum of the Whole”
There’s so much to say here and it’s admittedly hard to form a reaction because so much of how I feel about this now depends on what will happen with it later. I’m just flailing about in a sea of “I take this a little too seriously” emotion. I guess I’ll try to break the episode down into the two major components.

The flashback: I was pretty meh about. Oh, there were parts that I liked (Zack!) and parts that I was eh about (the bringing of the team together) and parts that I really hated (cutesy references to the future) and overall it was just sort of ok. The suspension of disbelief that this hadn’t come up with Sweet already was also too much. The flip on the whole Bones/Booth hate each other thing was….complicated. I liked how it got them to the bickering pair we saw at the beginning of the series, but didn’t like that they didn’t have sex. I’m a huge advocate of the realistic and, frankly, Brennan’s character? Would have had sex with him. Which brings us to…

The conclusion: On the one hand, a round of applause for David Boreanaz and Emily Deschanel who act crying and sad and heartbreak, but still being in love, so well. And kudos for the show for ripping off this band-aid in a non-finale episode (less kudos for not ripping it off a season or two prior). The reasons both characters gave were both in character and depressingly realistic. It makes sense. It works. But the fallout from it will be what really matters. If I feel like the writers have a plan for what’s next, I’ll be ok. Unless that plan is a forced love triangle. Guess we’ll wait and see.

Robert

Stargate: Universe: “Space”, “Divided”
When SGU went on break earlier this year, it left us with a big cliffhanger as Rush ended up stranded on a desolate planet as the Destiny jumped back into faster-than-light speed. With the show’s central conflict between Rush and Young put to rest, it seemed like a turning point for the show, but now that the show’s returned for the second half of its pretty-great first season, things are not as they might have seemed. After Destiny’s run-in with an advanced race of aliens in “Space” (which I wasn’t looking forward to but ultimately liked how it was treated), there’s a noticeable difference in the characters across the board. Allegiances are being tested, tables are turning and the attempted mutiny in “Divided” almost left the ship without a commanding officer, but cooler heads prevailed and now our characters have to decide where they go from here.

Also, since I didn’t mention it before, I think it’s worth pointing out the daring of “Time” from earlier in the season. I won’t spoil it, but when a show has the guts to pull off an episode like that, then go to closing credits and leave it up to you to put the pieces together (yes, really, you just have to see it for yourself), that’s some pretty great viewing.

V: “Pound of Flesh”
Speaking of guts, compared to last week, here’s an episode I can get behind. A Visitor takes advantage of his fellow aliens’ Bliss-inspired trance and blows himself up in a crowd, forcing Anna to begin a purge of any Visitors that show signs of emotion. In the meantime, Ryan and Erica form a plan to tap in to Anna’s Bliss transmissions and use them against her, but that means someone’s got to find their way aboard the mother ship, and since Ryan is a V, he’s the first choice to go. What he doesn’t tell anyone is that his wife Valerie is preggers—a fact that Georgie inadvertently discovers while visiting in Ryan’s absence.

When Ryan gets fingered on his mission and is subjected to Anna’s “no-personality” tests—which he promptly fails—he discovers that the Visitors doing the testing are on his side, but the testing delays his return. As Anna’s signal is pirated and the worlds learns “JOHN MAY LIVES”, Georgie takes it upon himself to go up to the mother ship and find Ryan, but in a surprise turn of events, they arouse suspicion and only Ryan makes it out. It’s all just enough cloak-and-dagger to make things interesting and keep me wanting to see the next episode. Plus, how cool is it that this show digs deep for its sci-fi cameos, like Lexa Doig from Andromeda and Nicholas Lea from The X-Files?

The Shrug, and Other Crimes Against DVD Covers

Several of us at Sodapop Journal are graphic designers by trade, so naturally we’re interested in the way our entertainment ephemera is represented visually. Recently, a terrible scourge has befallen comedy DVDs, and it has a name: The Shrug. It’s easy to design for an action film, just show a lot of stuff blowing up. But comedy’s a little tougher. Do you show plot points? Do you try to make something that’s funny as a still image? Do you take the abstract route? Usually, they take the path of least resistance, which is representing the leading man as a natural born cynic, shrugging off a mad world that understands him even less than he understands it and its zany goings-on.

I first noticed this trend with Idiocracy, one of the funniest comedies of the last decade, but one that was rushed into theaters unfinished. It never even had an official poster, so for the DVD, this happened.

The Larry Charles-directed, Bill Maher-hosted anti-religion essay film Religulous is another tough sell. It mocks all the world’s religions and ends in a breathless tirade warning us that we will all die in an apocalyptic fervor if we don’t ditch God. Since the film didn’t pull punches, the poster takes the most gutless way out.

“What’s with you people?!? I’m Larry David! You’re all dumb!” A poster that phones it in, making it a perfect representation of late-era Woody Allen.

This monstrosity of a film may not get intentional laughs, but Travolta’s pose on this poster is so insane and completely disconnected from reality that it made me laugh about five minutes straight when I first saw it.

This got us thinking about other DVD cover laziness.

“Happily Ever After”

This week we find out how the long-suffering Desmond Hume may be the key to the rest of LOST’s final season.

Robert

As much as I like Desmond and wish everybody could just leave him and Penny to their life of happiness together, I’m glad he’s back for another stint. And so far this season, I’ve invested in the theory that the flash-sideways are the true destinies that await all of our characters, and even if some of them weren’t so uplifting, I’ve been comfortable with how they’ve all turned out because on one level or another they’ve stayed true to the characters. Not so in the case of Desmond.

I didn’t like alt-Desmond (hell, I didn’t even like alt-Charlie) because at this point in the series, I’ve counted on Desmond to be the stand-up guy who struggles through every adversity to be with the woman he loves; the man who knows where his heart belongs and fights every step of the way to get there. To suddenly see him as a Ryan Bingham-type clean-up man who has no need for attachments just felt false, nay, if felt wrong, and while I suppose it was necessary, bringing him back to the Desmond we know by the end of the episode in turn felt a little cheap. Still, by the end, I was steeped in the touching moments of past Des-centric episodes and caught up as he caught flashes of his previous/original life with Penny and Baby Charlie.

There were also two pretty big scenes in this episode that shaped what we should expect for the rest of the season. Charlie’s discussion with Desmond about “spectacular, consciousness altering love” and what he felt after seeing the blonde woman on Oceanic 815, and Daniel’s love at first sight of Charlotte and talk of familiarity and “another life”; they both mirrored each other and set up the idea that Desmond has the ability to change things if he chooses to. In those scenes, they’re referring to love and finding Penny, but as is the LOST modus operandi, it also applies to the rest of the show as a whole.

In fact, thinking back, talk of “choice” has been pretty rampant throughout all of the episodes lately, and it wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what the finale came down to—who chooses to stay on course and who chooses to take their alternate life. Could that even be the deal that Jacob and Smokey put on the table? Did Locke make the deal with the Devil to have a better life with Helen? Maybe Ben’s choice to submit to retribution will be rewarded with a life where he can see Alex again? As Charlie put it, maybe the flash-sideways don’t matter, but only if you don’t want them to.

As far as the electromagnetic mumbo-jumbo, I can’t help but think that LOST is teetering between pulling off a truly ballsy move and falling flat on its face. Widmore’s electromagnetic experiment made me recall a conversation I had a couple of years ago with Scott about Watchmen and how Desmond might be a Dr. Manhattan-esque character that can transcend time and space as we know it. Having Desmond hopping between points in time (a la “The Constant”) is one thing, but having him transcend two entirely different timelines is almost too preposterous. And yet, if Desmond can change the fate of the island and all of our characters by choosing neither Jacob’s nor Smokey’s offer (because he can experience both lives anyway), that could be pretty spectacular, I think.

Scott

Hmm. Something’s not sitting right with me about last night’s rapturously-received “Happily Ever After”. Since I’ve loved every other episode this season besides the obligatory Kate borefest, I’m a little surprised I feel this way. I should warn you now that the rest of what you’re about to read will mostly be a rambling free association about the nature of mystery itself.

LOST is a show that means many things to many people. Most people watch only to have its weirdness unraveled, caring surprisingly little about characters they’ve spent six years with. Some watched (in the first season at least, I doubt they’re still around) for the adventure elements inherent with a desert island show. Some watched for the Kate/Jack/Sawyer love triangle, especially in the years it was paired up with Grey’s Anatomy. I’m most interested in A) the bizarre, far-reaching mythology that touches on strange experiments, hippie communes, slave traders, gun runners, fate vs. free will, and something about the eternal battle between God and Satan, and B) the handful of extremely original characters who I still love (Locke, Sawyer, Ben, Desmond, Richard, Hurley, Jin, Sun, Jacob, The Man In Black). These characters may take long leaps off the logical deep end in the finale, but I doubt it.

The mysteries being solved, though, that’s another story. I’ve long said that our hopes will be dashed by whatever happens in the final episode of LOST, because solving mysteries is inevitably disappointing. It’s a process in which an endless array of ideas and possibilities is slowly whittled down to a single idea that pleases few. Think The Matrix, or Battlestar Galactica, or Twin Peaks: all exciting, unique, enigmatic worlds that ended with a thud. David Lynch nailed this perfectly when discussing the end of Twin Peaks. He wanted Laura Palmer’s murder to go unsolved, a central mystery that a universe of interesting characters swirls around. The network intervened and forced the writers to solve the murder, killing a national phenomenon after just a season and a half. The idea of the unsolved mystery (a concept that LOST creator JJ Abrams has also discussed at length as “the mystery box“) continued to fascinate Lynch, inspiring the scattershot Twin Peaks postscript Fire Walk With Me and the more fleshed-out Lost Highway, a film that infuriates many but succeeds wildly at its ambition of exploring mysteries without ever fully solving them.

All my babbling leads me to this: “Happily Ever After” might be my first taste of disappointment with the finale of LOST. The typical reaction seems to be that this is an instant classic that unites what’s happening on the island with the flash sideways, merging the two timelines through Desmond’s demigod-like powers that he acquired by turning the key in the hatch. While this is blowing minds left and right, I’m just not that impressed. To me, it’s no different than the resolutions to any of the previous alternate timeline escapades like Season 4′s attempts to get back to the island or Season 5′s time-traveling Dharma stuff, except that this time, it’s THE END. It may be interesting to see Desmond informing each Oceanic 815 passenger that they have the free will to choose to live in one timeline or the other. But it also feels like a bit of a cheat since free will doesn’t come with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. I think many of us would take different paths in our lives if we could look at things from a distance, but to me the power and poetry of free will is choosing one path over another without knowing what lies ahead.

And I feel like I’ve seen this before. Deja vu? A feeling that something’s amiss with the world? Alternate universes and realities? And what cuts through it all, like a sword of truth through a veil of lies? The power of love. This is pretty conventional sci-fi storytelling, and though LOST’s Jacob/MiB mythology deals with archetypal religious stories we’ve heard a million times, it still feels like the fate of the universe is at stake (at least in my Bible Belt-raised mind). “Happily Ever After” just feels like reheated Philip K. Dick with a heaping spoonful of Hollywood sentimentality.

Then again, I think there’s a big chance that my pissiness about this episode is 100% related to my complete and total aversion to anything having to do with Eloise and Chuck Widmore at this point. I am a very Zen LOST-watcher. I don’t get angry because it moves slowly. I digest the plot as Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse want me to because I believe in what they’re doing. But there’s something about these two that drives me completely up the wall. We’ve got six episodes left. Six. Out of 121. And these old folks are still spouting cryptic bullshit that would’ve angered me in season 2. Tell us what you know and die already.

But there’s a really good chance that I’m wrong about all of this.

Dennis

As “The Constant” and “Flashes Before Your Eyes” have taught us in the past, Desmond episodes are always a good time. I find Desmond and Penny’s relationship to be the most compelling of the show’s and it got some nice moments here. Not exactly surprising, but Widmore and the Tina Fey lookalike (Tina Faux?) Zoe sent “special” time (and universe) jumping Desmond to the alternate timeline, thus finally tying the two worlds together.

From the opening credits, seeing Dominic Monaghan/Sonya Walger/Finnolua Flanagan/Jeremy Davies/Fisher Stevens as guest stars, I knew this was going to be at least a decent episode. Is it me or did Dominic Monaghan get cooler since Island Charlie died? (See also: Ian Somerhalder as laid back Sideways Boone in the season premiere). Despite my recent LOST crankiness I really liked this episode! Good job, LOST.

One pet peeve though: Does everyone on this show have to have a soulmate? I mean Desmond and Penny are great, but Richard and his dead ladylove a few episodes back, Locke and Helen, Charlie and whoever he saw in his hallucination (Claire perhaps?), whoever Daniel saw that made him get all sciencey (Charlotte perhaps?). Can no one move forward in life or have a grand epiphany without help from their respective ladies? Maybe only Tom Friendly, and we’ve yet to see his Sideways Self…

Armando

What an absolute joy it was to watch this episode unfold. When the full magnetics hit Desmond and the screen went to the panning of the clouds, I knew right then that we were in for a ride. I thought back to how I felt when watching the live series premiere of LOST back on September 22, 2004. While I was fully invested in what was happening on the screen and thinking to myself what direction they were going to take this show about stranded plane crashes survivors in, I never for once thought that six years later we would be here.

What an incredible ride. Finally, I feel like we are in the home stretch of the story. This episode was like a reward for sticking with the show. There were moments in it that connected to various past points in the storyline that now made those moments even better than they were the first time. This series should be fun to watch again, knowing what we now and what we may (or may not) know when it is over.

We finally got to see that absolutely, something is “not right” in the alt time line and now, we are seeing characters who are feeling and reacting to this. We also see that the Widmore’s seem to know what exactly is true and isn’t true and also seem to be the ones who have determined and/or control what the alt time line versions of the characters have become. How great was Faraday with his formulas that he wrote when he woke up? This scene could be seen as a nod and a wink to my favorite movie of all time, Back To The Future. (Doc hits his head on the toilet and when he comes to, he has a vision of the flux capacitor!)

You can see the feeling and sense of disconnect from this alt “reality” that the characters are having. I loved the surrealistic undercurrent in the tone and rhythm of this episode. It was right on point and well played. It tugged just enough.

The scenes where Charlie was waxing poetic on seeing love at first sight were to me, the most surreal. It’s something we can all relate to. Even if you don’t fully understand how these instances of enlightenment are connected to their “true” lives, it was still something we can connect with as people when we have those moments. We’ve all had those feelings. Deja vu? Have I been here before? How come I feel so comfortable here? I feel like I already know you.

This connection between those true emotions and the underlying overall story of what is happening to these characters is brilliant. It’s what makes it so easy to invest in the show. At this point, I am so emotionally attached to these characters and their story that I am now sure I will absolutely be leaking at the eyes when the last episode ends and goes black. But alas, we still have five more episodes left and I will savor every minute of it.

Next week’s episode looks like it will be more of this same ride to the finish line. The way Sayid showed up all kick-ass at the end of the episode was a jolt to my system after the Zen-like state it put me in. Perfectly timed. Well done.

Well, look at that. Give us a Desmond episode and all kinds of reactions come about! What did you think, LOST fans?


Armando Reyes talks comics, music and life on the road on Twitter.

The Last Word on The Last Airbender

Update: The speculation in this piece required corrections, the substance of which may be found here.

The Last Word on The Last Airbender

I’m really looking forward to having you guys on the set… I might even let you say ‘action’ once.

M. Night Shyamalan to Michael Dante DiMartino and Brian Konietzko, mid-2007

Just before the four-part series finale of Avatar: The Last Airbender, there was an episode that was essentially a play within a play—”The Ember Island Players.” In it, the main characters covertly visit a theater, wherein a troupe of actors from the antagonistic Fire Nation has created a play based on the events of the show so far. What follows is the stuff of absurd parody; a caricatured mockery of the characters’ actions as viewed through the distorted lens of Fire Nation propaganda, each character reduced in turn to cardboard cutouts of themselves, played by actors hilariously, insultingly unsuited to the role.

When their writing staff penned that episode, did show creators Michael Dante DiMartino and Brian Konietzko already have some inkling of how their series was being adapted by M. Night Shyamalan? It is impossible to know for sure, but one thing is clear—the collaborative process that the production of The Last Airbender should have exemplified broke down very early in the film’s production, with the result that Shyamalan exercised complete and final creative control, with DiMartino and Konietzko mostly or completely uninvolved.

The three appeared genuinely excited about the prospect of collaboration back in September 2007. The Season 2 DVD collection included an interview wherein DiMartino and Konietzko interviewed Shyamalan about the prospect of a live-action film. The pair spoke apparently genuinely of their respect for Shyamalan’s craft; Shyamalan in turn praised the series’s mythology.

At that point, Shyamalan seemed to still be in the process of outlining his script for Airbender, an outline that had apparently been so long that a film based on it would have made a seven-hour movie, so reluctant was he to omit anything. It is clear that he genuinely loved DiMartino and Konietzko’s creation, and that they were excited to be involved with and learning about live-action filmmaking.

What’s less clear is how the pair felt about Shyamalan’s ongoing efforts. In fact, since that interview—which by now is almost three years old—they have been utterly silent about the live-action adaptation of A:TLA. At the 2008 New York Comic Con, they jokingly introduced character drawings from “The Ember Island Players” as “live action feature concept designs,” but at their San Diego Comic Con panel later that year, they said nothing about the film, and at the next year’s Comic Con—by which point early casting news had broken—they did not so much as host a panel, appearing only at an informal gathering to autograph posters and pose with costumed fans.

How could they have been so thoroughly cut out of the film’s creative process? It’s not hard to imagine. Hollywood genre films—that is to say, SF/fantasy films—are big bets. If they’re not a sure thing—i.e., based on an established property that a studio believes has built-in credibility with audiences—then they need a charismatic advocate who can drum up support with his or her name alone. Shyamalan is uniquely positioned to do this, so no doubt Nickelodeon was ecstatic over his interest in A:TLA, a show that had been very successful, but—one senses—didn’t fit their brand and programming strategy the way SpongeBob or Fairly Oddparents did. So when Shyamalan came to Nickelodeon wanting to turn DiMartino and Konietzko’s opus into a big-budget, live-action film, the network must have fallen over itself to give him everything he asked for in terms of creative control.

And who can blame DiMartino and Konietzko for being excited about this opportunity? Their baby, a long-shot by any standard, had not only found success enough to carry it through its planned three-season arc, but was now getting a shot at big-time mainstream exposure and success. The A:TLA film was attached to a director whose oeuvre may have been uneven, but whose name could bring audiences in, and who genuinely seemed to understand and love their work.

But it would turn out that Shyamalan didn’t understand A:TLA at all, and his efforts to make Airbender “edgier” and “more real” seem to have amounted to him exercising complete directorial fiat over the project.

DiMartino and Konietzko have had any number of chances to speak out in support of the film, yet they have taken none. The controversial casting choices that have dogged the film’s marketing ever since they were announced have received no endorsement from either creator.

In what can only been seen as a desperate attempt to drum up some good buzz for the film, Paramount held screenings of a rough cut as early as February of this year, then again in March; responses were mixed but mostly negative as audiences failed to connect with or even understand what Shyamalan had to show so far.

What is going on here? This is mostly supposition, but given how these things generally work, it seems likely that Nickelodeon perceived Shyamalan as being higher up on the entertainment totem pole, and were thus eager to hand creative control over to him—he is the writer, director, and producer of this film. Later, though, as Paramount began to assemble their summer 2010 lineup, Airbender went from Shyamalan’s pet project to a major part of the studio’s strategy. At this point, senior studio executives—i.e., the people giving the director his money—would’ve wanted to see the work in progress.

But did they like what they saw? The answer seems to be “no.” The stakes are high for Paramount. Airbender is a tentpole film for them. A large part of their summer movie strategy is built around it, and they need it to succeed. Recent casting calls for extras of “asian descent” hint at last-minute reshoots for a project that has perhaps gone off the rails. The fans that should be the film’s biggest cheerleaders are divided; a few are cautiously optimistic, but most are either resigned to its mediocrity or actively campaigning against it.

And why shouldn’t they? DiMartino and Konietzko have practically unlimited credibility with fans of the show; with a single positive interview they could turn thousands of A:TLA fans into advocates for the film. A better box office return surely puts money in their pockets. Yet their silence is deafening. Why?

There is only one reasonable conclusion: They aren’t saying anything positive because they don’t have anything positive to say. For whatever reason, DiMartino and Konietzko lost their faith in Shyamalan’s ability to tell their story as early as two years ago. Since then the only publicly-facing project they’ve worked on is an A:TLA art book, which notably is being published by Dark Horse Comics, rather than Paramount partner Del Rey. Did they go with Dark Horse in order to avoid any studio tampering?

Whether or not they choose to use the art book as an opportunity to obliquely voice their opinions on the film, their silence tells a clear story—a story of trust they extended to a filmmaker with all the best intentions but who ultimately lacked the ability as a writer and director to deliver on those intentions.

Even now, a few fans try to stay optimistic about The Last Airbender, but to them I say, Mike and Bryan gave up on this movie a long time ago. Who do you trust—them, or the guy who made The Happening?

Remote Uncontrolled 22

A bald man has just slapped a blonde woman and she is reeling from the blow.

You know what’s great? The fact that we live in the future. In the past when the weather would start to get nice like this, we’d be forced to choose between watching TV and frolicking in the warmth (because obviously not watching TV is not an option). But now we have the freedom to watch whenever we want, however we want! Even on tiny futuristic screens we can touch!

Ok, maybe some of the egregious product placement this week is infecting me. Whatever. I’m too busy having my spring cake and eating it while watching old DVDs outside to care. I hope you are too. Tell us about it in the comments.

Robert

V: “Welcome to the War”
For the past month or two, ABC has been doing heavy promotion for V’s return (thanks for the countdown timer during LOST, ABC) and it seemed that things might be looking up. After the months-long wait since the first four episodes ran in late 2009, I was hoping the show would come back a bit more polished, but after last week’s “Welcome to the War,” my hopes are a bit dashed. I thought the show was moving a little too fast before, but now V is ramping things up even more, throwing developments at us one after the other—Jack and Chad each have their run-ins Visitor healing technology, Erica and friends track down a new member for their resistance, Tyler’s assimilation continues and Anna gets her freak on—to the point where none of them seem to have any distinct weight. The show feels like it’s trying to make up for lost time and losing any sense of pacing or nuance in the process. If ABC wants this show to take the reigns from LOST as their next big sci-fi series, they’ve got their work cut out for them.

FlashForward: “Better Angels”
Speaking of beleaguered ABC sci-fi series, I also had hopes that FlashForward would return and make good on any promise it left us with last year, but it’s been a rough 2010 so far. At least this week we get to revisit a thread from the beginning of the season as some of the team head to Somalia for answers about the remaining NLAP tower. While there, they come under fire from a local warlord named Abdi—the boy who witnessed the 1991 “test” blackout—and challenge his interpretation of his flash forward in which he’s actually a peacemaker for Somalia. Unfortunately, the team discovers the bodies from Abdi’s village, sending him into a rage that ends in a fatal showdown with Vogel. So here again, FlashForward tells us that the future doesn’t have to happen the way everyone saw in their flash. I liked it better when the characters in this show had to find a way of defeating their destiny, but now it’s like all bets are off. That’s great and all but where’s the drama in that?

LOST: “The Package”
We also caught up with the Kwons in last week’s Getting LOST, and well, it gave us just enough to hang on to while also discovering what the “package” is. Plus, that Sun knows how to unbutton a button or two, doesn’t she?

Zoe

Bones: “The Bones on a Blue Line”
I got a little giddy about this show’s return from the now-standard and somewhat strange Late Winter Hiatus. It’s not that Bones is the best show on TV, but dagnabit, it’s my story. I just like watching it (unless it really annoys me). And this return heralds…almost nothing. I mean, the episode was OK enough: fun, but nothing that blows you away, with a huge dollop of predictability. Add my annoyance with TV’s insistence that it is possible to get calls/text messages while riding the subway, and I come out kind of eh.

That said, it was nice to see them remember that Brennan is an author and nicer of them to recognize that she might need some help with stuff (although I do feel that lately they’ve ramped up the idea that she doesn’t get people, which seems…inconsistent and also unlikely, given how much growth she’s made as a person). Regardless, I am still pretty dang excitement for the birthday present the show is giving me, in the form of a flashback. Fingers crossed no one tried to make a call in a mine shaft.

Modern Family: “Game Changer”
Just below me Dennis is going to say a bunch of stuff I agree with, I just wanted to air my dislike here. It’s not that the product placement wasn’t in character, per se, but also that it was dull. I like Modern Family, but it has yet to really win me over, and episodes like this make me make a really sour face and consider ditching it next season in favor of more detective dramas.

Dennis

Modern Family: “Game Changer”
This is the sort of episode that a few minutes in I realized what the writers clearly didn’t, this was not a good idea. The A-plot of this episode was: “It’s Phil’s birthday and he iPad iPad, and iPad iPad iPad.” Seriously, drink every time iPad was mentioned in this episode and watch alcohol poisoning set in. I  knew there’d be swift charges of blatant product placement (there were) and then the people behind the show would probably come out saying they’re was no money exchanged (they did). But who cares? The episode just wasn’t that good. Between Desperate Housewives forgetting Penny’s special day, andThe Middle forgetting Sue’s, if I see one more ”family screws up someone’s birthday” plot on ABC, or anywhere on TV, this season, or ever, it’ll be too damn soon.

Ugly Betty: “London Calling”
Yay Gio’s back! And Christina! And…ugh, Henry. I guess I’m in the minority of watchers of this show but I never understood the appeal of Betty’s nerd boyfriend. Once they gave him a baby with Charlie, and all the lame trappings therein, I just always thought Betty was too good for him. Gio, on the other hand, was maybe too good for Gio, but I wanted those two together. And Freddy Rodriguez’s return as the sandwichmaker, just reminded me that he really needs a new show post-Six Feet Under/Betty. (Luckily he’s at least got a pilot). Gio had a line that he always knew there was only one guy for Betty. Is it wrong to hope he was referring to not Henry, but someone else we haven’t met? Still, I’m happy Betty’s writing has gotten fresh and oh-so-watchable again, after two mediocre seasons. It’s just a shame it got good just in time to get cancelled (I call this The OC Syndrome). And I’m glad its parading out old character favorites. I know Jayma Mays and Kevin Alejandro (he could’ve come back as Santos’ ghost?) are on Glee and Southland now, but is it too much to ask for a Rebecca Romijn return at least?

iPad Entertains, Oh Yes It Does

Apple iPad

When the iPad was announced back in January, there was understandable excitement over Apple finally acknowledging that it had the long-rumored device up its sleeve for some time now, but there was also a hefty amount of skepticism over whether it would be the right balance of innovation and practicality to be successful. When Steve Jobs first demonstrated the iPad by showing us how to use Mail of all things, the potential seemed to fade instantly, but now that we’re on the eve of launch day, all of the fun apps are starting to show themselves. And just like the iPod and iPhone before it, the iPad will likely give every other portable media device a run for its money.

Here’s what we’ve already seen announced:

Games

Electronic Arts, arguably the biggest game developer on any platform, is bringing some of its biggest hits to the iPad, including Need for Speed SHIFT for iPad ($14.99), Scrabble for iPad ($9.99), Mirror’s Edge for iPad ($12.99), Command & Conquer Red Alert for iPad ($12.99) and the venerable Tetris for iPad ($7.99).

If some of those seem a little steep, smaller developers are also getting in on the action for less but without sacrificing quality. Founded by former-EA exec Neil Young, iPhone-exclusive developer ngmoco already has versions of Charadium ($2.99) and it’s hot new thing and current addiction We Rule (free) available. Veteran casual games dev PopCap brings an “HD” version of its latest hit Plants vs Zombies ($9.99) and Aussie-based Firemint expands on its two quality iPhone titles with Flight Control HD ($4.99) and Real Racing HD ($9.99).

Movies & TV

Given the popularity of games on the iPhone—an evolutionary step from the chintzy mobile games of yore—it was only expected that the iPad would launch its share of games, and it looks like video content is about to make the same leap with the iPad. Not only is there the 3G/Wi-Fi capability like the iPhone, but now there’s a bigger screen to work with.

Surely there must’ve been some Apple/Disney partnering to get the ABC Player (free) app out the door featuring full streams of ABC’s entire line-up, especially when all of ABC’s shows are also available in the iTunes Store itself. Free is always nice, right? Also, CBS is tailoring its site to work with the iPad by ditching Flash for HTML5 (another story altogether) to provide iPad-friendly video streaming and NBC is well ahead of the game with an iPhone-friendly video site and will most likely use the same technique to accommodate the iPad.

Maybe the biggest surprise is the introduction of an iPad app for Netflix (free) that works with your subscription’s Watch Instantly queue. It’s a boon for customers that regularly use the Netflix streaming service because now there’s no longer the need to be attached to a computer or set-top box and you have full control over your account and queue with the app’s integration of the Netflix web site.

Not one to get left behind, online video hub Hulu is also reportedly tossing around the idea of a subscription-based iPad app for streaming its library of films and TV series. This along with Netflix could make for a lifetime of truly portable on-demand video with minimal costs. Sound revolutionary to me.

Comics, books & periodicals

Unlike the leaps forward in video (and games and music before that), Apple is hoping the iPad will truly revolutionize the oldest medium in the world—the printed word. You could wager that it’s at the core of the iPad’s design; the size, the shape, even the weight are designed to feel as comfortable and practical as any book or magazine.

First out of the gate is Apple’s own iBooks (free + in-app purchases) app that, with the integrated iBookstore, serves as both a store and repository for all of your digital books. While this is a direct shot at Amazon’s Kindle, anyone already invested in the rival e-reader may not be out of luck if an iPad version of the Kindle for iPhone (free) app surfaces.

Aside from plain ol’ books, the iPad really shines when it’s used for the full-color presentation of comic books and magazines, and publishers aren’t waiting around. Comic book publishers Marvel (free + in-app purchases) and IDW (free + in-app purchases) are already on-board with full iPad versions of their apps, while magazines are being given their own special treatment, whether in a specialized app like Popular Science+ ($4.99) or GQ ($2.99), or as part of a larger distribution service like Zinio’s forthcoming app. And of course, newsprint stalwarts like TIME ($4.99), The Wall Street Journal (free + in-app purchases), USA Today (free) and The New York Times (free) are ready for the iPad, showing us they can adapt with technology and the times.

All this and the iPad isn’t even available in stores yet. Tomorrow it’ll likely be another story, though. If you’re getting an iPad (or even just excited at the possibilities), do you have any cool entertainment apps to share?

A Special Kind of Story

This isn’t exactly entertainment-related, but I wanted to share this story of John Nese and Galcos Soda Pop Stop not because it’s about soda (although that is especially charming), but also because it mirrors the same passion we tend to have here at Sodapop Journal.

In the last year or so we’ve covered all sorts of movies, TV shows, music and so on, and we believe that entertainment is a treat, not an entitlement, so we do our best to keep our coverage grounded in honest opinion and free of rampant cynicism and snark. That’s not to say we won’t be disappointed when one of our favorite TV shows goes awry or when the biggest film ever is an impressive-but-troubling success, but tearing something apart just for the sake of it is too easy and nobody’s any better off as a result.

Instead, Sodapop Journal focuses on talking about different entertainment for different tastes in a way that we can all be satisfied. I like to think John Nese has the right idea by building a market where the little guys can hold their own, and that’s something we’ll keep striving for here at SPJ. As some wise dude once said, “It takes different strokes to move the world.”

Obsessives – Soda Pop